In
Business Home
Yucca
Mountain main page
It's
time to break the silence on Yucca Mountain
Why
Yucca Mountain is wrong
Yucca's
engineering unsound
Nevadans
plan to emphasize the risks of transportation
The Yucca Battle:
What you should know
Salt
Lake mayor joins Yucca fight
Clark
County real estate values jeopardized by waste shipments
Tourism
would suffer from dump
Nightmares
feared in Utah town
Arizona,
California Towns at Nuke Transportation crossroads
Barstow
official says feds behind in training
Guinn
says more money needed
Senators
are last hope for Nevada
Lawsuits,
courtroom showdowns loom
|
A
Message From The Executive Editor
Why
Yucca Mountain is wrong
By
Steve Green / In Business Las Vegas
Nevada's tourism-centered economy was just turning the corner in the rebound from
the Sept. 11 terrorism when it was blindsided again in February.
Nevada
was not hit by terrorists, but by President George Bush as he designated Nevada's
Yucca Mountain as the lone, permanent
burial site for the nation's high-level nuclear waste.
Nevada politicians
jumped into action, vowing to block the dump in Congress -- or failing that, in
court. They also asked Nevadans to donate money to the fight, saying millions
of dollars were needed for anti-dump advertising, public relations and lawsuits.
Then, much to our surprise, not much happened.
The casino industry did
make a donation of $750,000 -- a token effort given the industry's revenue, profits
and substantial stake in the outcome. A handful of business leaders stepped up
with some money. But it was only a handful.
We at In Business were stunned
at the lack of interest among the casinos and other Nevada businesses in fighting
the dump.
We wrote stories quoting a lot of business people who, generally,
said they had more important things to worry about or really didn't understand
Yucca Mountain and how it would affect Southern Nevada.
We're now hearing
from some business people who think the nuclear scheme is a done deal and is not
worth fighting. We're hearing from many residents of Nevada and surrounding states
that Yucca just isn't important to them.
The owners of this newspaper
remain committed to fighting Yucca Mountain and awakening the general public and
key decision makers to the crisis at hand. That's why we've been publishing public
service announcements urging Nevadans to contribute to the state's anti-Yucca
fund.
And that's why this week's In Business includes this special report
on Yucca Mountain.
We can't compete with the nuclear power industry's
lobbying money. But as journalists who care about this community, we can expose
as many readers as possible to the truth about Yucca and nuclear waste. If we
can help raise a few dollars, or help change a vote or two, we'll have helped.
In these pages you'll learn:
--The nuclear power industry's growth plans
and profit goals are behind the plan to send its waste to Nevada and a so-called
temporary dump in Utah. Neither state has nuclear power plants.
--Why
shipping the industry's nuclear waste to Nevada and Utah makes the waste more
vulnerable to terrorist attacks than leaving it at existing reactor storage sites.
--Why Yucca, even if approved, can't solve the problem it's intended to. It can't
prevent waste from continuing to pile up for decades at existing nuclear industry
storage sites all around the nation.
--That Yucca Mountain has not been
proved safe or capable of storing nuclear waste and that to solve this problem
the Energy Department will rely not on Yucca's geologic barriers to radiation,
but on waste casks.
The government's argument means, by definition, that
thanks to this engineered solution the waste can be safely stored anywhere in
casks and doesn't need to be transported.
These are Nevada's arguments
against the dump.
You'll also learn that, despite a few voices to the
contrary, Nevada isn't for sale when it comes to nuclear waste. We're not interested
in compromising our lives in exchange for nuclear waste jobs. We don't want federal
money to compensate Nevada for accepting the nuclear industry's garbage and exposing
our children and their children to potentially deadly radiation.
And you'll
read arguments that it's morally wrong to force a state to accept an out-of-state
industry's poisons -- poisons vulnerable to leakage, accidents, sabotage, theft
and terrorist attack.
Once you're as informed as we are about the dangers
of Yucca Mountain to Nevada and the West, we hope you'll take some action. Call
your U.S. senators, write letters to your local newspapers and perhaps use the
public service announcement on this page to learn how to donate money to Nevada's
anti-Yucca fund. Finally, you can pass along this special report to others you
know who may be in a position to join this fight. Yucca
Mountain main page
|